The ELSORV (Enhanced Logistics Off-Road Vehicle) is a new military vehicle for the United States Army that was developed by SRATS (Specialized Reconnaissance Assault and Transport System) Incorporated. It resembles a Humvee but with much more agility and off-road capability. It is based on a similar vehicle designed for SOCOM (Special Operations Command) over the last five years. The vehicle can carry four passengers and 2700 pounds payload, and have modified Humvee engines that can conquer approach angles of 90 degrees and climb slopes at 80 degrees. The new vehicle is designed to help alleviate maneuverability constraints in the rugged terrains of Afghanistan for resupply and med-evac purposes. Sources: www.army.mil www.arcent.army.mil Footage: US Army News Footage: all rights reserved
Video Rating: 4 / 5
This Video show’s The worlds most powerfull Military US ARMY US Air Force USMC US NAVY Firestarter!
Another overpriced piece of military hardware. Who profits? Big defense contractors.
@pele220 No they already got oshkosh building them.
too bad its probably cancelled by now
well, well, look what the rednecks have inspired…
WAS I THE ONLY ONE THT FREAKED OUT WHEN HE SAID coming to a battle ground near you
@nick8874 and those “rednecks” are are serving yours truely America
built by rednecks
@doncroswhite
Hey, thank’s for sharing with us!
I got to drive one of these, there really nice. They give allot when you turn. They do things that would a Humvee could only dream about.
OMG I need one of those SOON. With the torque and clearance I can see this being so important even in the desert.
NO chance of National Guard Units getting these though….
Not an insurgent out there that could get away even if a barrier was built up of disabled vehicles and miscellanies other stuff.
Think about Black Hawk Down when the roads were blocked, if they had vehicles like this they could have crawled over the barriers. (maybe, depends on incoming fire of course…. )
thats cool, i grew up offroading also, and i always wondered why offroaders didnt design military vehicles, since offroad is what they have to do daily besides protecting, it does you no good to get stuck while being fired on. GREAT JOB GUYS
@88pie88 Dont forget the US Gov always has secret weapons we probably dont know about…
@BigAL6767 f-35 and f-22 are useless. requires 10 hours of work on them to fly for one hour. It has half the Radar systems of the j-20 jet and the SU-35. Abrams can get knocked out by a well aimed RPG-7. T-90 and type 99 tanks can survive a direct hit from a javelin.
AK-109 is cheaper and more reliable and accurate then the m416-m16a4-and m4.
Russia and china have double our military in size . There SAMS can shoot down our planes, from a distance from D.C to New york. were fucked dude.
And the most 2 fucked up lying gov’ts. on the planet
Just goes to show, money buys you power!
the most useless and weak militery in the world usa militery that could not win the war against a few brave and unarmed afghans, shame on you
USAs AIR FORCE BRITAINS NAVY UNSTOPABLE
@phishinguy2000 the rocket : was just a modded V2 rocket. and germans made it alrdy work. we alrdy started some v2 rockets , u can see videos of it on youtube too. and ur moon rocket, was made by werner von braun, google his name. but i think u know him alrdy. and i say again, its not as easy as it was for u. u were free after war, we tried to create stuff while defensing to the half world. no money and stuff. but we still made it. thats why i respect this, and try to protect it on youtube
@AggroBuLLeT Yes I have studied the Manhatan project and it started long before Germany surrendered. Whether you had the plans or not, the US was the only one able to create on and make it work. Same goes for the Rocket. Germany first to create it and the US first to make it work and work well. It was the US and Russia to first fight in jet air to air combat. It was US todevelop air to air missile. It was US that put a man on the moon. It was russia to fist launch a sattelite, etc etc.
@AggroBuLLeT Hold on there. I never said your army sucked. I probably know more about ww2 history then you do. I probably know even more about german ww2 history as well. There is no doubt german army was the most powerful army int he world at BEGINNING of WW2. Pound for pound they were the best, great weapons, great soldiers and EXCELLENT tactics. Using the defense of fighting 58 countries is not an answer. If anything it just says Germany was stupid and arrogant.
@phishinguy2000 READ HERE FIRST. before u say anything wrong, just remember we are talkin about WORLD WAR 2 atm, not future. and id rather to talk Via PM with you, cause we have done enough spam here. but idc do as ur wish
@phishinguy2000 and again : sayin our ww2 army sux because we lost 2 times is stupid. we could kill ur US army any time blind. in 1vs1 ofc, and not 1vs 58. we dont even need half army. we just need few V2 and ufo. look at france, france is a very strong army, but germany only needed 150k people to kill the whole country in 3 weeks. we had 18m wehrmacht + alot waffen SS, but didnt even need, just 150k was enuff, cause the rest was all over the world.
@phishinguy2000 the A bomb, have u ever study about this? hitler was the first one who had this bomb. he just didnt use it because he said ‘ people who are dead are not controllable’. anyway we never used the bomb. but einstein helped u to build one. and u also got our build plans right after the war.
@phishinguy2000 first: i was talkin about german qww2 army NOT army today. next: yes your army sucked there. you say we are loser cause we surrendered? no we just got a brain. because of ww2 63million people died. do u know howm uch germans? 4m. thats the best kill/death ratio ever. plus u guys had ally supply from 58 countries, now u feel strong? u still had the lowest kills and much victims.
@AggroBuLLeT The only thing that is laughable now is comparing German military to that of the US, now thats funny. You would be what we call a speed bump. There is no doubt that Germany produces some of the finest weapons ever built, from the panther to the Leo2 from the Kar to the Sturm, from the 109 to the 262 etc.. But to say you are the best becuase you built great weapons for 2 world wars you started and lost is pretty funny.
@AggroBuLLeT Lets see where do I begin with the laughable US military in ww2? We crushed the worlds largest and most powerful navy in the world where you barely had one. We created the atomic bomb before you. We had more tanks then you did. We had more planes than you did. We had more bombers than you did and we had to come halway across the world to fight. I am sorry your country is a 2 time loser. The US itself does not know what surrendering is like, you guys seem to be good at it.
@AggroBuLLeT After ww2 the US gavce you money to survive, not to get your rocket info, we already got that from you. We gave you moneyto help rebuild your war mongering country. You are welcome. As for our Army being laughable, you might want to check out what the veterans from the battle of the bulge had to say about that. You started your war making capabilites years before the US and we caught up to you in the blink of an eye. Your pride is clouding your common sense.
@11binf9 in ww2 the only thing u protected was germany after war. srsly durring that war, ur army was a laugh. u joined when the war was almost done, because germany had a war with 58 countries, and even then u wasnt a strong power, you can say anything about german army TODAY, but in ww2, we had the best technology, best weapons, biggest army on earth. this is a fact too. and the reason why u protect germany after war was: you need to know the v2 rocket technic, to fly to the moon.
@AggroBuLLeT I understand your point and yes, we all need eachother. The US has protected Europe sinceduring ww2 and since. There is a reason why european countries do not spend much money on military. Its because they have the worlds only military superpower with bases in europe providing that detterent. Thats not my opinion, its a well know fact. As for ww2, how you can say we did not protect you is beyond me. I think the families of all the soldiers in ww2 would disagree with you.
@11binf9 iam sorry i dont know how to explain in english, and i dont want u to think im insulting ur country.. im just sayin that germanyis like the US a world power, and no without us ( means without the EU ) you cant get in afghan. you do need germany for many things, you do also need other countries for many things, and same with germany and them, we do need u too. world isnt easy today. the US protected EU? if ur talkin about ww2 then ur badly wrong.
@AggroBuLLeT Maybe I am confused on your meaning. I do not understand whenyou say we NEED Germany to fire a single bullet in Afghanistan or take one foot in Afghanistan. To me it sounds like you are saying that without Germany we could not be fighting in Afghanistan. I would certainly take umbridge with that statement because it is 100% incorrect if that was its meaning. Every Country needs allies, this is not something proprietary to the US. Last I checked it was the US that protected EU
@11binf9 do u need us to get even ONE step in afghan? YES. do u need us to fire a single bullet in afghan? YES. i dont know what we are talkin about now, but i was talkin about everything, not just weapon products. trust me politicts are not easy, and today you NEED allies. and since germany is the head of EU again, yes you need us, like u need UK and france, i think you got me wrong becuz my english is bad. i never tried to insult ur country or something.
@AggroBuLLeT You are kidding me right? You may have produced the first jet aircraft bit please do not be confused in thinking no one else was developing them as well. We do not NEED you, what part do you not understand? Do we need you to build the best jet fighters in the world? Nope. Do we need you to build the missiles that make the jet fighter an effective weapons platform? Nope. Do we need you to build our missile defense systems? Nope. I can do this all day.
@11binf9 see and there is YOUR problem. look BACK in the days, without germany there wouldnt be a single assault rifle in the world, there wouldnt be a jet. there wouldnt be any space rocket. THATS why u need us. ofc today u just copy our old stuff and make it better, and no get ur facts right again, alot of countries give us money to build weapons for them. know about th XM8 or HK416 program for the USA army? you can say what ever u want, but we a great ally, and yes you need us,like we need u
@AggroBuLLeT We use a german gun because it is a good gun at a good price. We were building a joint MBT in the 70′s and 80′s but then decided to go seperate ways. We could build our own or use UK . If you stoppped selling us the gun, do you think we wouldnt be able to make our own ? Lmao, thats funny. Now the UK is a power becuase they are small but have 100 times the combat experience of Germany. They truly have great technology that covers land air and sea, germany does not.
@AggroBuLLeT Theres your problem right there! “read the internet” I am not wrong in any of my facts. Your airforce has never flown a combat mission in a jet. Your eurofighter is a joint program. Please do not compare your aiforce technology to ours, its not even close. Neither is your navy. You build great tanks and SP’s but you are in NO way a superpower when it comes to military.